Sharon H. v. Comm’r of Soc. Security Admin. (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2023) - incontinence, absenteeism, remand for award of benefits 2) The ALJ failed to

2)  The ALJ failed to properly consider the lay evidence from Angel L

1)  The ALJ’s reasons for finding the opinion of Roberta Strangfeld Russell

1) Whether the ALJ’s reasons for finding the opinion of Dr

Briefs for purchase: Plaintiff’s Brief and Plaintiff’s Reply Brief and court decision remanding with directions to award benefits

Tishuk’s opinion

Sharon H. v. Comm’r of Soc. Security Admin. (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2023) - incontinence, absenteeism, remand for award of benefits 2) The ALJ failed toSharon H. v. Commr of Soc. Security Admin., Case No. 2: 23 cv 00468 RMG MGB (D. S. C. Sept. 15, 2023) (Order by U. S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel) Briefs for purchase: Plaintiffs Brief, Plaintiffs Response to Defendants Contested Motion for Entry of Social Security Judgment, and remand order Topics addressed: Severity standard breaks due to incontinence RFC treatment regimen Past relevant work composite jobs Evaluation of depression Incontinence