Pay in 4 interest-free payments of $18.75 Learn more
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 3 - Aug 8
Medical opinions – consistency
3) The ALJ’s RFC assessment is not supported by substantial evidence
Social Security Ruling 11-2p
to conclude that Dr
2) The ALJ’s mental residual functional capacity assessment finding does not properly account for [Plaintiff’s] inability to interact with others
Vanissa C. v. U.S. Commissioner (W.D. La. Aug. 22, 2022) - onset date, mental RFC, subjective complaints Medical opinions – consistencyVanissa C. v. U. S. Commissioner, Case No. 3: 21 cv 04454 TAD KDM (W. D. La. Aug. 22, 2022) (Order by District Judge Terry A. Doughty) Briefs for purchase: Appellants Social Security Brief, Motion to Remand, and Judgment granting Motion to Remand Topics addressed: RFC relationship with PRTF findings RFC interacting with co workers, supervisors and the public Subjective symptoms improper focus on objective evidence Subjective symptoms regulatory
US$ 12.00
US$ 164.50
US$ 159.00
US$ 10.50
US$ 34.00
US$ 27.50
US$ 18.99
US$ 47.00
US$ 23.00
US$ 30.00
US$ 31.00
US$ 34.99
